A binding requirement to build the George Hotel and Resort never existed

Lawyer retained by Coast Clarion says covenant between town and developer has no timeline, no penalties, and cannot be enforced

(By News Desk)

Do we have any guarantees that developer Klaus Fuerniss will build a hotel first, Councillor Annemarie De Andrade asked at the May 19 council meeting (see 52:20 mins.) where a two-year extension of the development permit for The George Marine Resort and Residences was approved. 

“I believe there’s a resolution from council that requires that a hotel be built and that the occupancy permit will not be issued for the residences until the hotel is completed,” Chief Administrative Officer Emanuel Machado replied. “That’s in the development agreement. But we can confirm that with [the] planning [department].”

Councillor Stafford Lumley was sure of it, too: “I’d be willing to bet a lot of money, because I can remember very vividly a motion that was made by then-Councillor Jeremy Valeriote, and the CAO is correct, there is a condition that until the hotel is built, nobody can occupy the residences. It’s in the agreement. 

“I mean, you could roll your eyes, I guess, but it’s in there. The last council thought it was prudent to put that in there so that he couldn’t — exactly like you’re saying — couldn’t build condos, sell them, and go ‘oh, I’m not going to build a hotel anymore.’ It’s actually there, I mean, you should look into it if you want, personally, or ask the planner, or Mani, to get that for you, but I know for a fact that it’s in there,” Lumley said.

The Coast Clarion followed up and asked Machado where this agreement could be found. A check by The Clarion of the development agreement found it does not contain a requirement to build a hotel, let alone a clause stating that occupancy permits for the residences cannot be issued until the hotel is completed. 

Machado did not respond. 

More than a week later, after an email to the mayor, he said the director of planning would answer the question.  Two weeks later, Lesley-Anne Staats emailed that “there are a number of covenants registered on the title of the property, restricting the land use of the property, including the development agreement, the hotel-use covenant, the flood covenant, and the land-exchange agreement.”

There is nothing in the development agreement, the flood covenant or the land-exchange agreement about a requirement to build a hotel.

But the hotel-use covenant  says a hotel must be built, and it specifies what kind of hotel: The George. It does not say that the hotel must  be built first, and there is no mention of occupancy permits for the residences not being issued until the hotel is completed. 

The Clarion took the covenant to Gibsons lawyer James Graham for an assessment. 

“There is no real requirement to build a hotel in this covenant,” he said. “First, there is no timeline. When must the hotel be built? It does not say. It could be 25 years after the condos, or never. There is nothing in here that says that both are to be built at the same time.

“Second, there is no mention of penalties if the hotel is not built. How is the town going to enforce this? I can’t see why he couldn’t just say: ‘I built the condos, now I don’t have the money for the hotel’.”

The town would have had an opportunity to impose conditions when the developer asked for the two-year extension of the development permit, Graham said. “‘You have to build a hotel and we set a timeline, and if you don’t comply, we fine you,’ the town could have said.”

All the covenant does is restrict the use of the land. Only condos and a hotel with The George Hotel design can be built on the site, and the covenant stays with the land, whoever owns it, Graham said. 

The former George residences sale centre in Lower Gibsons.After this photo was taken, the sign was taken down.

The George Residences sale centre in Lower Gibsons has closed; the space is for rent. The George Marine Resort and Residences website has not been updated since 2017. The Klaus Fuerniss Enterprises office in Kern’s Plaza has also closed. If the site is sold, a new developer can only build condos, and a “George” hotel. Or no hotel.

Lawyer’s fees for this article and the cost of title searches were paid for by readers of The Coast Clarion. The writers are not paid. If you find these articles valuable, please consider a donation. 

7 comments

    1. No. We’ve been being hoodwinked from the beginning by the developer and two complicit councils. Too bad more of the good citizens of Gibsons didn’t see it.

  1. Woa woa woa….. big clouds of smoke from Machado and Lumley. What if the land changes hands? What do purchasers do then? Can you see the legal wranglings that are about to come? What a terrific mess.If the council of the day had done business as business should be done we would not be having these conversations and legal wranglings.Now on to “getting back to what’s real”.

  2. The former council and mayor got this mess started and the present council and mayor seem to be determined to go down the same path. The wind has been sown and now a whirlwind is being harvested. The next item that will hit the fan is the fact that on July 28th 2015 the council of the day decided to grant the George developer the leave to excavate a 3 meter swath all along the southern edge of our Winegarden Park which will result in the destruction of dozens of mature trees in a public park and the annihilation of the eco-system there. Of course those that rightly oppose it and point out that this is illegal under the Community Charter (sections 29(1) and 30(1) are troublemaking tree huggers who should just go away and let private interests log our park. Maybe the mayor and town should stop writing that nature is our most important asset because it sure doesn’t look like that from here.

  3. My bet is that this hotel project has already sold to a foreign buyer and the two-year extension voted for by our politicians is there so that when the water lots are permanently given to this developer the sale of the project will be finalized. In my opinion this deal has been done for a long time as evident by the closing of the sales office and inactive web site.
    In my opinion, our latest politicians have just continued this George fiasco and sale of public assets when they could have done something to stop it. They have no concerns that all the giveaways from us, will turn into profit for a developer and we will be stuck with this outdated development on the waterfront. Just my opinion …. Please tell me I am wrong.

Comments are closed.