Arbitrator rules landlord was wrong trying to evict Janice Williams

Gibsons artist hopes her story is an inspiration to other tenants dealing with landlords who are acting in bad faith

Janice Williams

(By News Desk)

After almost a year of doing battle with her landlord, Janice Williams has learned she can stay in her apartment above the Gibsons cinema, paying $1050 a month. 

Arbitrator T. Wellman of the Residential Tenancy Branch ruled this week that landlord Mario Laudisio acted in bad faith when he tried to evict her, and that he had tried to deceive her. He cancelled the eviction notice.

Laudisio told Williams he was ending her tenancy after she complained about water pouring in from the roof, and large patches of mold in two rooms. The ceiling in the dining room had partly caved in and she could not use the overhead lights or the baseboard heaters because of the water. 

The roof in Williams’ apartment had been leaking since she moved in in 2013 but in October last year, the situation grew much worse. Williams complained and Laudisio had the drains cleaned, but it did not solve the problem. 

At the end of January, after more complaints by Williams, Laudisio called a roofer who found seven inches of standing water on the dilapidated roof and advised that a mold remediation company was required immediately.

A contractor examined the damage and told Williams there was a high likelihood the drywall contained asbestos. Williams, who lost half of one lung to cancer, was concerned and called the Environmental Health officer of Vancouver Coastal Health, who referred the case to WorkSafe BC. 

On February 4, Laudisio sent a handyman to fix up the apartment. When Williams asked him if he was trained or certified to deal with asbestos or mold, he said he was not but he could Google it. Williams told him she would not let him do the work, for both her and his health. 

After WorkSafe BC had become involved, Laudisio hired a contractor who took samples of the drywall and found asbestos.

Laudisio then told Williams he was ending her tenancy “given the possible extent of the asbestos removal and renovation costs required.” 

On February 27, he had a four-month notice posted on her door, with a move-out date of June 30, 2021. 

Laudisio said he was going to completely renovate and update the apartment so a caretaker could move in. 

Williams found a lawyer who was willing to take the case without payment. He asked that The Coast Clarion not mention his name. 

Laudisio said he was ending Williams’ tenancy because his daughter, her realtor husband and their three small children, who live in North Vancouver, were moving into the one-bedroom apartment. 

After the daughter admitted to the arbitrator that she had never been to the apartment and that she had not discussed the move “in great detail” with her father, Wellman found Laudisio’s story “unconvincing”. 

“I find these actions demonstrate the Landlord’s lack of good faith and [he] has established an intention to deceive the Tenant,” he wrote. 

He ordered the eviction notice cancelled; Laudisio also has to pay Williams the $100 filing fee. 

The roof has been patched, not repaired. Two new leaks have developed since the dispute was filed with the Residential Tenancy Branch. The walls have new drywall. 

Williams did not go out and celebrate when she learned she can stay in her home. “I was exhausted. When I heard I had won, I went to bed and for the first time in a long time, I slept like a baby,” she told The Coast Clarion. 

“This has been so hard. I felt harassed and intimidated for almost a year. People were walking in without my permission and banged on the doors and walls, I received a number of unpleasant emails, the landlord gave instructions not to accept my rent, I received letters from lawyers, it never seemed to stop.”

She is happy she stuck it out, though. She hopes her story is an inspiration to other tenants facing landlords who act in bad faith. 

7 comments

  1. Congratulations to Janice! I hope her victory encourages other tenants to fight back in cases like this.

    What needs to happen is an end to allowing landlords to raise the rent above the yearly limit if they change tenants. This is an incentive to find spurious reasons to evict people.

    1. That’s a tough one to regulate. Who would be in charge of every units’ rental rate and increases? At the end of the day this apartment likely requires tens of thousands of dollars to be properly done at which point it would seem reasonable to raise the rent but having said that often regular maintenance by a more proactive landlord would have prevented the more costly issues in the first place.

  2. Sweet dreams Janice, you deserve them. What a crappy deal you got from this guy. I can only hope that someday he experiences some of what he just put you through. – michael maser

  3. Great news! But most folks in this situation do not have access to a lawyer who will take them on pro bono, and just end up homeless. What are people supposed to do without the benefit of free legal help?

    1. It would seem that the Residential Tenancy arbitration system is biased towards landlords. Maybe, since the landlord is the most likely party to be able to afford a lawyer, the rules should be changed so that if one party can’t afford legal help the other party shouldn’t have a lawyer present either?
      Meanwhile, it is good that Janice won, because this landlord is now on record as misrepresenting the facts. He has evicted many other tenants in the past but has never been taken to arbitration until now. Hopefully, Janice’s win will mean he can’t so easily evict people in the future, even if they can’t afford a lawyer.

  4. You stood your ground and won!! Congratulations Janice!!
    This huge step in helping all tenants who have similar experiences with horrible landlords!!
    Bravo🙏👏

  5. My heartfelt thanks to every single person who helped me get through this past year! I can never thank you enough! If I try to list you all, I’ll surely forget someone, and then I’ll feel bad! Thank you, Coast Clarion, for your kindness in enabling me to reach out to other distressed renters with my story and the subsequent Dispute Hearing Decision. The intense stress, frustration, loss of privacy, and anxiety of the past year will be worth it a thousand times over if it helps encourage just one person to dispute what they feel is an unfair eviction notice. I was unbelievably fortunate to have the expertise of an amazing lawyer who went to bat for me. I’ll be contacting the Law Society today to nominate him for their Pro Bono Award. I believe it was his countless hours spent researching and organizing our case–superbly presented and argued, despite it being outside his field of expertise–which resulted in a Decision I believe can give many others that desperately needed feeling that there’s a ‘hope in hell’! <3

Comments are closed.